You must be signed in to read the rest of this article.
Registration on CDEWorld is free. Sign up today!
Forgot your password? Click Here!
Scope of the Problem of Nonprescription Stimulant Use in Academia
Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NPS), drugs frequently prescribed to treat Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), is defined as using medications without a prescription or in a way that is inconsistent with a medical diagnosis.1 The purpose of this short report is to provide a brief review of the literature on NPS use in academia, the legal and ethical issues regarding NPS amongst dental hygiene students, and suggested best practices for addressing NPS use in dental hygiene programs.
The most widely prescribed stimulant medications include amphetamine, methylphenidate, and dextroamphetamine.2,3 Properly dosed, these medications increase attentiveness, decrease distractibility, and improve daily functioning and have been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of ADHD.3 While considered safe and effective treatment of ADHD symptoms, this group of drugs are classified by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as schedule II, due to their high potential for abuse.4 Recently the FDA required manufacturers to place a "black box" warning on the medications highlighting the potential for serious consequences resulting from misuse including "sudden death and serious cardiovascular events."5 Furthermore, the warning also identifies these drugs as having a "high potential for abuse" and warns against the possibility of individuals obtaining the medication for distribution to other individuals.5
The prevalence of college students with a diagnosis of ADHD has been reported to range anywhere between 2% to 8% with prescription stimulants the first-line agents for treatment of the condition.6-10 As the ability to diagnose and effectively treat ADHD has increased significantly over the last twenty years, so has the availability of prescription stimulants on college campuses and NPS use, particularly among college students.9 A study by Teeter et al. found that in a random sample of college students, 8% reported NPS use at least once in their lifetime, and nearly 6% had reported NPS in the past year11; however, Weyand et al. reported rates as high as 55%.6 Garnier et al. reported that nearly two-thirds of college students had been offered prescriptions for nonmedical use and nearly one-third reported NPS use by their fourth year of school.8
Research has shown the illicit use of stimulant medications is more prevalent among traditional students ranging from 18 to 24 years of age than among nontraditional students over the age of 25 years.4 It is also noteworthy that NPS use is not limited to college campuses in the United States (U.S.); increasing numbers of stimulant prescriptions globally has led to growing concerns regarding misuse in European countries as well as in Canada, Australia and Israel.12 While much of the research on NPS use in young adults has been conducted on the general college student population,6 several studies have been conducted regarding use among medical students, with lifetime use prevalence estimates ranging from 9% to 18%.13 Nonmedical use of prescription medications, specifically stimulants in addition to illicit drug, was surveyed among health care professional students (medical, physician assisting and pharmacy) in the state of California.13 Nonmedical stimulant use was highest in physician assisting students (14%) followed by medical students (10%) and pharmacy students (6%).13 Reported NPS use amongst fourth year dental and senior dental hygiene students was found to be 12% in a population of students surveyed from the south-central region of the U.S.14
In general, college students engaging in NPS use frequently cite the need for an academic advantage as a reason for using stimulants without a prescription.1 In the study by Teeter et al, students believed that stimulants would enhance concentration, assist with studying, and improve concentration.11 However, in spite of the widely held student perception that NPS use increases academic performance and that stimulants are being used by the best students, a number of studies have questioned this assumption.15 Research has shown that college students engaging in NPS tend to have lower-grade point averages than non-users and did not demonstrate any detectable academic advantages over their peers.1,9,11 Another noteworthy finding from studies focusing on NPS use in the general college student population is the association of NPS use combined with heavy alcohol consumption and other illicit drugs.9,11
In the study of NPS use among dental and dental hygiene students, the highly competitive, stressful school environment was considered a risk factor for using stimulants non-medically.14 However, of the 12% of the respondents who reported NPS use, improved attention/concentration was cited by the majority (70%), followed by recreation (17%) and higher grades (13%), and there were no statistical associations between stress levels and NPS use in the population surveyed.14 In the study of health care professional students, a desire to "improve concentration/help focus" was cited as an important reason for NPS use.13
Drug diversion, the sharing, trading or selling of prescription medications among friends and peers, is the most common sources of NPS.3 A study of college students found that in a sample population of students with an ADHD diagnosis, over one-half (61%) had diverted their medications to someone without a prescription.8 In the McNeill et al. study of dental and dental hygiene students, 87% of the students engaged in NPS use had obtained the medications from their friends.14 Classmates and friends were also cited as the primary sources of prescription stimulants by health care professional students.13 While there are ongoing concerns about future substance abuse and possible side effects including cardiovascular reactions and health complications related to NPS use, it is also important to emphasize the legal ramifications of drug diversion.15,16 Individuals are often unaware that it is illegal to sell or give away controlled substances, including prescription medications. Conversely, it is also illegal to obtain drugs that are outside of one's own medical prescription.15
Addressing Nonprescription Stimulant Use in Dental Hygiene Education
National studies have drawn attention to the problem of NPS on college campuses. While the literature on illicit NPS use among dental and dental hygiene students is limited to the McNeill et al. study,14 the general concerns regarding legal issues, future addiction, substance abuse and health complications in college student populations should be taken into consideration in dental hygiene education programs.3,5-8 It is important to be aware of the overall prevalence of NPS use within the culture of the individual institution as a whole, in addition to developing departmental policies.15,16 A majority of health care students (87%) reported being aware that stimulants were being used at their institutions to enhance academic performance and over two-thirds (67%) believed that faculty were aware of the NPS use.13 Universities should have clearly stated policies on drug diversion and the nonmedical use of prescribed controlled substances such as prescription stimulants, and consequences for illegal behavior should be clearly spelled out in student handbooks.15 Dental hygiene programs can mirror institution wide policies on substance abuse in their individual departmental policy manuals.
In addition to addressing NPS use in university and departmental policy manuals, there are a number of ways the ethical and legal issues surrounding NPS use can be addressed within the context of the curriculum. The American Dental Hygienists' Association (ADHA) Code of Ethics for Dental Hygienists can be used as a framework for discussing ethical dilemmas related to NPS use.17 Beginning with the basic premise of professional responsibility, stating that dental hygienists are responsible for maintaining a lifestyle that supports optimal health, students could discuss the impact of drug misuse on general health along with the legal and ethical ramifications of drug diversion. As future health care providers, students engaging in NPS use are violating ethical principles that apply to all health care providers. The core value of societal trust comes into question when an individual chooses to illegally divert a drug or misuse a prescription medication. Addressing issues related to the commonly held perception that NPS use is acceptable and safe behavior can be included in the context of the class discussion focused on professional ethical behavior.15,16 Veracity comes into question when one engages in obtaining and using a prescription drug illegally. Harming one's self through the health risks associated with NPS use violates the value of non-maleficence in that NPS use, while caring for patients, may increase their risk for harm.
Self-medicating through NPS use can also be seen from the moral perspective of performance enhancing drugs. In a study regarding the moral perspectives of NPS use by students, Verster and van Niekerk found that the cognitive enhancement therapies gained through prescription stimulants were considered to be acceptable for individuals with an attention deficit disorder.18 However, prescription stimulant use by individuals with the goal of cognitive enhancement was considered cheating, allowing users an unfair advantage, and raises ethical issues similar to those encountered in athletics.18
Many dental hygiene programs engage in white coat ceremonies in which students officially receive a white coat before they begin to care for patients, symbolizing their entrance into the health care profession. This rite of passage may include the reading of an oath and the acceptance of the professional responsibilities of becoming a health care professional. NPS diversion and use breaks the fidelity to this promise. However, since many health care professional students engage in NPS use for academic purposes, rather than to obtain a high as with other illicit drugs, they often overlook the implications of abusing a schedule II, controlled medication.13,19
Possessing a controlled substance without a valid prescription is a violation of the law, and individuals found to be guilty may be sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment of not more than 4 years.19 Drug and alcohol convictions could result in being dismissed from a dental hygiene program. Previous convictions must also be disclosed in dental hygiene licensure applications and may prevent a candidate from receiving a license to practice.
There is a need for dental hygiene faculty members to better understand the rationale for NPS use amongst students and develop strategies to ultimately reduce the risks of prescription stimulant misuse in dental hygiene education programs. The nonmedical use of prescription drugs should be viewed within the larger context of the college or university substance abuse and mental health programs.15 Incorporating NPS use into campus drug prevention initiatives begins the discussion on the fact that NPS use is just as illegal, unethical, and detrimental as any other illicit drug, and that the same consequences as outlined in the university policy manual apply to NPS use. This education can be done through online modules immediately following acceptance into dental hygiene school and/or during orientation.
The ethical and moral aspects of NPS use for the purpose of enhanced cognitive abilities should be considered in the institution's academic honesty policies and fall under the same category of disciplinary procedures as any other illicit substance. Dental hygiene programs can consider adding academic honesty statements incorporated into each examination. A sample academic honesty statement is shown in Figure 1. Dental hygiene students should understand that the consequences due to cheating will be the same, regardless of the method used.
It is imperative for students, faculty members, staff, and administrators within dental and dental hygiene programs to become aware of the potential risks, legalities, and ethical issues with the misuse of stimulant medications and implement best practices in order to monitor NPS use and promote a drug-free environment.
About the Authors
Kandyce M. A'see, RDH, MS is an assistant professor; Kathleen B. Cantey, RDH, BS is an instructor; both in the Department of Dental Hygiene at Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Corresponding author: Kandyce M. A'see, RDH, MS; firstname.lastname@example.org
1. Arria AM, Caldeira KM, Vincent KB, et. al. Do students improve their grades by using prescription stimulants nonmedically? Addict Behav. 2017 Feb;65: 245-9.
2. Sharma A, Couture A. A review of the pathophysiology, etiology and treatment of attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Feb;48(2):209-25.
3. Benkert D, Krause KH, Wassam J, Aidelsburger P. Effectiveness of pharmaceutical therapy of ADHD in adults - health technology assessment. GMS Health Technol Access. 2010Sep 7;6:Doc 13.
4. Sharbaf Shoar N, Molla M. Dextroamphetamine- amphetamine.[Internet] Treasure Island (FL):StatPearls Publishing; 2018 Dec 24 [cited 2019 Feb 24] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507808/
5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: safety review update of medications to treat attention/deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults [Internet]. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2018 [cited 2018 Sept 27]. Available from: www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/ucm279858.htm
6. Weyandt, LL, DuPaul G. ADHD in college students. J Atten Disord 2006 Aug;10(1):9-19.
7. Flory K, Payne RP, Benson K. Misuse of prescription stimulant medication among college students: Summary of the research literature and clinical recommendations. J Clin Outcomes Mang. 2014 Dec; 21(12): 559-68.
8. Garnier LM, Arria AM, Caldeira KM, et al. Sharing and selling of prescription medications in a college sample. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;71(3):262-9.
9. McCabe SE, Knight JR, Teter CJ, Wechsler H. Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction. 2005 Jan;100(1): 96-106.
10. Rabiner DL, Anastopoulos AD, Costello EJ, Hoyle RH, McCabe SE, Swartzwelder HS. Motives and perceived consequences of nonmedical ADHD medication use by college students: Are students treating themselves for attention problems? J Atten Disord. 2009 Nov;(13):259-70.
11. Teter CJ, McCabe SE, Cranford JA, Boyd CJ, Guthrie SK. Prevalence and motives for illicit use of prescription stimulants in an undergraduate student sample. J Am Coll Health. 2005 May-June; (53):253-62.
12. Kaye S, Darke S. The diversion and misuse of pharmaceutical stimulants: what do we know and why should we care. Addiction. 2012 Mar;107(3):466-77.
13. Bidwal MK, Ip EJ, Shah BM, Serino, MJ. Stress, drugs, and alcohol use among health care professional students: a focus on prescription stimulants. J Pharm Pract. 2015 Dec;28(6):535-42.
14. McNiel AD, Muzzin KB, DeWald JP et al. The non-medical use of prescription stimulants among dental and dental hygiene students. J Dent Educ. 2011 March;75(3): 365-76.
15. Arria AM, DuPont RL. Nonmedical prescription stimulant use among college students: Why we need to do something and what we need to do. J Addict Dis. 2010 Oct;29(4):417-26.
16. Sussman S, Pentz MA, Spruijt-Metz D, Miller T. Misuse of "study drugs:" prevalence, consequence and implications for policy. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 Jun 9;1:15.
17. American Dental Hygienists' Association. Bylaws and code of ethics [Internet]. Chicago (IL): American Dental Hygienists' Association; 2018 June [cited 2018 Jul 25]. Available from: http://www.adha.org/bylaws-ethics.
18. Verster C, van Niekerk AA. Moral perspectives on stimulant use by healthy students. S Afr Med J. 2012 Oct;102(12):909-11.
19. United States Code. Title 21-food and drugs [Internet]. Washington (DC): U.S. Government Publishing Office; 2011 [cited 2018 Sept 27]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCODE-2011-title21/USCODE-2011-title21-chap13