ADA CERP is a service of the American Dental Association to assist dental professionals in identifying quality providers of continuing dental education. ADA CERP does not approve or endorse individual courses or instructors, nor does it imply acceptance of credit house by boards of dentistry. Concerns or complaints about a CE provider may be directed to the provider or to ADA CERP at www.ada.org/cerp/
Approved PACE Program Provider. FAGD/MAGD credit. Approval does not imply acceptance by a state or provincial board of dentistry, or AGD endorsement. 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2022. ID # 209722.
January 27, 2017
By Robert Del Castillo, DMD
Supported by Zest Anchors, LLC
Many patients with fully edentulous arches are candidates for implant-supported or retained denture prostheses, which eliminate many of the issues experienced with traditional dentures. However, the CBCT data on which implant positioning is based may lead to a prosthesis that does not passively fit. Although screw-retained hybrid abutment solutions have helped to resolve this challenge, the procedures involved are time consuming for the dentist, laboratory technician, and patient. An alternative to cement- or screw-retained implant attachments is a fixed locator attachment system for rigid connection of full-arch restorations onto endosseous dental implants that is simpler to place, more precise, and easier to maintain by eliminating the need for cement, screw access channels, screws, and composite filling materials.
Discuss the limitations of CBCTs when planning implant/abutment position for retaining full-arch prostheses.
Describe the approaches for overcoming deviations in implant/abutment positioning when retaining full-arch prostheses.
Explain necessary considerations when selecting cement- or screw-retained abutments for full-arch prostheses.
Describe the components of a removable attachment system for fixed full-arch restorations.
About the Author
Robert Del Castillo, DMD
Private Practice, Miami Lakes, Florida